![]() ![]() However, you may want to lobby the producers/developers of TB for that feature. ![]() So I can live without it in the core product. Would you want them all built in? And before you assume that the facility in hand is surely a 'to be assumed' basic, let me add that although it seems like a very nice feature, I, like DanRaisch, never had a use for it up to now and the only contact I have had with it is through locating and examining the extension in response to some other people's expressed needs. However, it is clear that someone really wants those facilities. As you come to scan the available extensions you will realise that 95%+ of them are of absolutely no interest whatever to you. Maybe the power of T-bird is in the Add-ons, which of course novice users will struggle with. The main value of a POP client as opposed to clunky webmail clients, is the automatic, no user interaction required, extraction of attachments. ![]() Markxyz wrote:But I still don't understand what folks were thinking when they designed the baseline T-bird attachment handling. Thanks for that.īut I still don't understand what folks were thinking when they designed the baseline T-bird attachment handling. It's not perfect, but at least you found a workable solution to my problem. It generates extra files with cryptic names from signatures in addition to the correct file with the attachment. I did try this Add-on and it does sorta work. Here I'm thinking of the Lexmark scandal where their SW sent a copy of what you were printing back to some company to "help improve print performance". Of course, I never specifically searched Add-ons, mostly because I'm not sure which ones are to be trusted. I executed a dozen searches and never found it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |